COMM 337: Feature story link, Oct. 29 assignment

Your next 1,000-plus word analysis of a feature story is due a week from Monday, in class on Oct. 29. It's on an article in this week's New Yorker by Margaret Talbot. It's titled "Stealing Life," and it's a profile of television producer David Simon, a former reporter for The Baltimore Sun who now writes and produces the HBO show "The Wire." It's available on line. Hurry up and print it out, because The New Yorker may not archive the story on its website much longer. I also have a print copy of the magazine if you need to photocopy it.

Either way, you should get started reading it now. It's long. I haven't counted words, but 6,000 words is a pretty standard length for magazine features. And I'd say it's at least that. It takes up 12 pages in the magazine.

But it's an excellent story. Talbot is a New Yorker staff writer and a senior fellow of the New America Foundation. She's written for quality publications like Atlantic Monthly and the New York Times Magazine. Her writing, at least this story, is solidly based on in-depth reporting.

What to look for ... and what I'll be looking for in your papers:

• Simon's experience at The Baltimore Sun gives him an inside perspective on the newspaper business. What does he say about the past, present and future of newspapering? How is his world view shaped by having been a reporter? How does that experience affect the way he goes about writing the show? What do you learn about the craft of newspapering from Simon?
  
• This year's story line will be about a fictional newspaper that is based on the Sun and even uses its name. Several of the people working with him on this year's "Wire" show are ex-colleagues at the Sun. How do their backgrounds in newspapering shape their world views? What do they say about journalistic standards? How do their professional standards, values and instincts affect the show? What do you learn about journalism in 21st-century America from reading about Simon and his colleagues?
  
• How good a reporter is Talbot? How does she manage to reflect in her writing the subtle flavor of speech in the Jewish community (look for phrases like "keeping kosher" for following Jewish dietary laws), and in people from Baltimore and New Orleans? Cops? Politicians? Street hustlers? Musicians? (Notice, too: They're all interested in language, in listening to people, really listening, so they can get just the right word.) How much of Talbot's story is based on interviews, and how much on direct observation? What does she hear and what does she see that lends versimilitude to the story? What do you learn about the craft of reporting and writing from reading her story?

Week in and week out, some of the best reporting in America appears in the New Yorker. (I'm afraid Simon and his co-workers are right when they say you don't see much of it in newspapers any more.) And Talbot's is one of the better stories I've seen there lately.

Here's an insight I especially liked:

After years of reporting in Baltimore’s ghettos, [Simon] found himself at ease with being the only white person in a room, or the only person in the room who didn’t know how to re-vial drugs, and found, too, that he could channel the voices of people in the game. “To be a decent city reporter, I had to listen to people who were different from me,” Simon explained. “I had to not be uncomfortable asking stupid questions or being on the outside. I found I had a knack for walking into situations where I didn’t know anything, and just waiting. A lot of reporters don’t want to be the butt of jokes. But sometimes it’s useful to act as if you couldn’t find your ass with both hands.”

A warning, though: It helps you keep it covered if you can find it with both hands. Don't ask how I know that.

Another insight. It's gloomy, but unfortunately it rings true. Talbot says:

This final season of the show, Simon told me, will be about “perception versus reality”—in particular, what kind of reality newspapers can capture and what they can’t. Newspapers across the country are shrinking, laying off beat reporters who understood their turf. More important, Simon believes, newspapers are fundamentally not equipped to convey certain kinds of complex truths. Instead, they focus on scandals—stories that have a clean moral. “It’s like, Find the eight-hundred-dollar toilet seat, find the contractor who’s double-billing,” Simon said at one point. “That’s their bread and butter. Systemic societal failure that has multiple problems—newspapers are not designed to understand it.”

Fortunately, reporters like Talbot and magazines like The New Yorker are.