Wednesday, July 13, 2016

Echoes of Nach Hitler Uns?

"Not Chicago 1968, but Berlin 1932"
ROBERT J. S. ROSS -- MARCH 28, 2016
http://prospect.org/article/not-chicago-1968-berlin-1932

Robert J. S. Ross is a Member of the Board of Directors and Vice President of the Sweatfree Purchasing Consortium.

* * *

Listen up Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders supporters, and pay close attention, those who think of themselves as being to Sanders’s left: History will judge us sternly if we fail this moment.

Earlier in 1932 Adolf Hitler’s Nazis had become the largest party in parliament, with about 37 percent of the popular vote. The Social Democrats (SPD) and Communists (KPD) together had about 36 percent of the vote, but were in fierce, mortal competition. The traditional German nationalists could not form a stable government without so they called new elections. Now, in November, Hitler lost seats and the combined vote of the SPD and the KPD was larger than his, as were their combined parliamentary seats. While the KPD was hostile to the Weimar arrangements, it nevertheless proposed to the SPD a common front against the early 1933 power grab by the Nazis. The hostility between the two working class parties with egalitarian visions was too deep.

The split that had created the Bolshevik-Menshevik divide in Russia and had divided the German working class parties over the Great War now prevented a united front against Hitler.

The Communists characterized the SPD as “social fascists”—no better than the Nazis. In a similar vein, leftist commentator Chris Hedges and others have recently written that Hillary Clinton is no better than Donald Trump: “Voting for Clinton and supporting the Democratic Party will not halt our descent into despotism.”

* * *

If left leaning activists are serious about their characterization of Trump as a fascist, a comparison recently made by former Labor Secretary Robert Reich, then they better get serious about the problem of unity. It is all very well for Hedges to tell us to vote with our feet in the streets, but as the last century teaches us, the ability of authoritarians to resist popular movements is robust. After the election of November 1932, Hitler came into office as Germany’s largest party (though a minority). And while working class parties together neared a majority, they were two divided to oppose him. The center parties—ostensibly committed to constitutionalism—succumbed to a fear of Hitler’s retaliation and a fear of the left. They cooperated in the formation of a government that would ultimately eliminate them.

The German elections in March 1933 were held under repressive and violent conditions and the concentration camps were next.

* * *

There is some value in thinking about 1968. Unable to countenance support for the administration which had made war in Vietnam, I advocated a boycott of the Humphrey-Nixon contest, while friends in California and elsewhere chose Eldridge Cleaver over Humphrey. In the meantime, the law and order backlash against our demonstration tactics in Chicago also helped Nixon win a razor thin victory over Humphrey. What we got was more bombing in Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia and a shameful episode of presidential abuse of power.

* * *

REEFER TO:

"Bernie, Hillary, and the Ghost of Ernst Thalmann" -- HAROLD MEYERSON -- JULY 13, 2016

In campaigning for Hillary Clinton, Bernie Sanders will be making sure his voters don’t suffer from the blind spot that plagued Nazi-era Communist leader Ernst Thälmann, who argued that the Social Democrats posed a greater threat than Adolf Hitler.

http://prospect.org/article/bernie-hillary-and-ghost-ernst-thalmann

Friday, July 08, 2016

Of shoeboxes, Illinois politics, Paul Powell, Gov. Joel Aldrich Matteson (1853-57) and some modest reforms proposed by state Sen. Daniel Biss, D-Skokie

Several years ago when each state got to design its own quarter, I wanted Illinois' to feature a shoebox. I was reminded of that today by a well-produced video titled "THE ROAD BACK: Culture of Corruption," state Sen. Daniel Biss, D-Skokie. I first saw it on my Facebook feed, but it's available on Biss' website at this address:

https://roadbackillinois.com/an-innocent-trip-to-the-dry-cleaner-35c33b8fda38#.57czl8hdm

(The video is in a June 29 blog post titled "An Innocent Trip to the Dry Cleaner," in which Biss discusses some of the differences -- and occasionally the very close similarities -- between bribery and constituent services. It's nuanced and clearly written, and well worth reading, as the video is well worth watching.)

At any rate, Biss taught math at the University of Chicago and he knows how to hold an audience. The video outlines practical reforms, starting with voter registration and consolidating the welter of special earmarked funds in the state budget, and it does so in an engaging, even entertaining manner. Biss sounds like he must have been good with undergrads at the U of C.

Which is where the shoeboxes come in.

Shoeboxes and Illinois politics, they just go together. And Biss milked the connection for all it's worth.

Everyone knows, or feels like they ought to remember, the story about the shoeboxes stuffed with $800,000 in cash that turned up in Secretary of State Paul Powell's Springfield hotel room after his death in 1970. No one knew how it got there, and Paul Powell's shoebox got to be kind of an Illinois political icon.

Which is why I wanted a shoebox on the state quarter.

Biss' contribution to my knowledge was to begin with a tale of the chicanery that went with the bond issue for the Illinois & Michigan Canal in the 1830s, and a scandal that arose when Gov. Joel Aldrich Matteson, governor from 1853 to 1857, was caught with as much as $200,000 in I&M Canal scrip -- a kind of banknote -- that had somehow been removed from a shoebox in the basement of the old State Capitol in Springfield. A grand jury investigation followed, but Matteson made restitution, no one was indicted and no one ever found out exactly what happened to the canal scrip.

This kind of stuff can be deadly, except to historians and Illinois political junkies, but Biss got my attention.

I'd never heard of Matteson before. But here's some information I tracked down:

  • Claire Suddath "A Brief History of Illinois Corruption," Time magazine website Thursday, Dec. 11, 2008 at http://content.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1865681,00.html.

    Suddath says:

    Reach as far back into Illinois history as you like and your hands will likely come out dirty. Blagojevich is the sixth Illinois governor to be subjected to arrest or indictment — seventh if you count Joel Aldrich Matteson (governor from 1853-1857), who tried to cash $200,000 of stolen government scrip he "found" in a shoebox. Matteson pulled a "how-did-that-get-there?" excuse and escaped indictment by promising to pay it back. (Oddly, this isn't Illinois's only shoebox-full-of-money scandal; after former secretary of state Paul Powell's death in 1970, a search of his home revealed shoeboxes full of hundreds of thousands of dollars in checks made out to him by unsuspecting Illinois residents who thought they were paying license plate registration fees).

  • See also James William Putnam, The Illinois and Michigan Canal: A Study in Economic History, Chicago: U of C Press, 1918. Chicago's Historical Society Collection, 10: 88 Google Books.

  • John M. Lamb. “The Great Canal Scrip Fraud,” in the December 1977 issue of The Magazine of Illinois 16.9: 57-60 at https://www.lewisu.edu/imcanal/JohnLamb/section_6.pdf.